- Scale Chronicles
- Posts
- Algorithmic Moats in the Facebook Ads Auction: Taking Your Competitor's Market Share
Algorithmic Moats in the Facebook Ads Auction: Taking Your Competitor's Market Share
Most business owners and advertisers don't understand how algorithmic moats form in the Facebook ads auction. Here's why your competitors' market share compounds and how to take it back before it's too late.

I love December for one reason.
(All business owners should).
It's the easiest month to take someone else's position.
Having worked in sales myself for years, and having helped hundreds of companies scale, I've seen something that most people miss entirely.
I've watched one business drown and blame the holidays for their collapse.
While another business, in the exact same market, has their best month of the year.
Same industry. Same economy. Same customers. Opposite results.
I've seen this pattern repeat itself without fail.
During the iOS14 rollout when everyone said attribution was dead.
During COVID when everyone said the market had frozen.
During every single holiday season when everyone says people aren't buying.
The external event is never the real reason.
The Identity Wall
Here's what I've learned from looking at thousands of data points across hundreds of businesses every single day.
Someone who is resisting the identity change that comes with the next level will use national dog day as an excuse if they have to.
It doesn't mean they're a bad person. Or lazy. Or that they lack discipline.
It means they've hit a wall built by their own identity.
We all have one.
You're seeing the results in your own business, and maybe in a handful of others in your mastermind group or friend circles.
But I'm looking at the full picture.
For someone out there, maybe even your direct competitor, the exact opposite reality is true right now.
They are not slowing down. They are pressing their advantage.
And here's the thing that should wake you up.
The decision they're making right now, in December, is not about December.
It's about who they believe they are as a business owner.
The Auction Is Not A Level Playing Field
If you have a lead quality issue, waiting for next month or next quarter is too late.
The more you spend, the more you reinforce the results you're currently getting.
The less you spend, the more market share your competitors gain, and the better seat they get in the ad auction.
But this isn't just about losing customers this month.
This is about what happens to your business when you go silent.
Think of the ad auction like a poker table.
The players who show up every hand, who understand the game, who have a track record of winning. They get better seats. Better odds. The house treats them differently.
When your competitor keeps spending while you fold your hand, they're not just winning this round.
They're building a reputation at the table.
When your competitor keeps spending while you pull back, they're continuously feeding the algorithm data. Over months or years, they build a massive data asset. Their Facebook pixel and Conversion API data become incredibly rich.
This creates what I call an algorithmic moat around their business.
They have trained the algorithm so perfectly that it can find their ideal customer with unparalleled efficiency and low cost. They know what creatives work. They know what audiences convert. They know what offers resonate.
The algorithm literally sees them as a safer bet.
So when you and your competitor are bidding for the same customer, Facebook's system predicts that your competitor's ad is more likely to convert. Even if you bid higher, their ad gets shown instead of yours.
You're not losing because you're outbid.
You're losing because the algorithm has learned to trust them more than it trusts you.
The Mindshare Game
Meanwhile, your competitor is also capturing something else entirely.
They're showing up in front of people ready to buy right now. They're capturing immediate demand you're forfeiting.
But they're also building brand recognition with the majority of the market that isn't ready to buy today but will be in the future.
When those future buyers are finally ready, your competitor is the first brand that comes to mind.
You are an unknown.
This is called the mere-exposure effect. It's a psychological principle where people develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them. By being constantly visible, your competitor's brand becomes familiar, trustworthy, and the default choice.
Think of it like this.
You walk into a coffee shop every morning for a year. You see the same barista. You see the same menu board. You see the same customers.
After a year, when you think of coffee, you think of that shop.
Not because it's objectively the best coffee in the city.
But because it's the one you know.
Your competitor is that coffee shop.
They're the familiar choice.
The Compounding Advantage
Here's where it gets worse for you.
Most people think the competitor winning has a cheaper CAC. They don't.
The competitor who is winning is actually willing to pay MORE for customer acquisition. They can afford to outbid you because they've built a business with a higher customer lifetime value.
They're not thinking about the cost of the lead today.
They're thinking about the value of that customer over the next three years.
So while you're pulling back because you're worried about cost per lead, they're pressing forward because they know that customer is worth $30,000, $100,000, or millions to them. So they can afford to spend more to acquire them if that customer is only worth 3-10k to you.
You can't afford to spend that because you haven't built your business to attract and serve clients at that level. You're operating in a completely different economic tier.
This is the difference between building a business for long-term value and building a business for short-term scarcity.
One thinks in terms of abundance. One thinks in terms of survival.
And when the market shifts, the survival mindset always loses.
Their higher LTV means more margin to reinvest. Better products. Better service. More aggressive marketing. A stronger business that compounds their advantage.
It's a virtuous cycle for them.
A vicious cycle for you.
And this is the part that most people don't understand.
The cost to retake that ground later is almost always higher than the cost of defending it in the first place.
When you finally decide to re-enter the market after a significant pause, you are not starting from where you left off.
You are starting from scratch.
Your algorithm is cold. It has no recent data to predict who will convert. Facebook sees your ad as a gamble.
Their algorithm is hot. It knows exactly who to target for the best results.
So you have to bid extremely aggressively just to get your ads shown. You're paying a premium to re-teach an algorithm that your competitor has already perfected.
But here's the real problem.
You can't afford to pay what they're paying because your LTV isn't high enough.
So you lose the auction.
They keep getting the customers. You keep getting nothing.
Your account has no recent positive history. It's unproven in the algorithm's eyes.
Their account has a long history of successful, high-engagement ads. Strong quality score.
They get preferential treatment. Better placement. Better results.
You're stuck in the learning phase. Your campaigns are volatile and inefficient as Facebook struggles to find your audience again. This phase can be expensive and lengthy.
They're out of the learning phase. Their campaigns are stable, optimized, and predictable.
And they're still outbidding you because they can afford to.
The Short-Term Advantage You're Missing
But here's what most people don't see.
December and January are not just about long-term positioning.
There's a real, immediate advantage happening right now.
When your competitors pull back, the people who are still looking for a solution are the ones with the most urgent problems.
They're not waiting. They're not thinking about the holidays. They're thinking about their pain.
And if your ads speak to that pain, they will book a call and take action.
When you acquire those customers in December, you're training your algorithm to find more like them. You're building a customer base of the most motivated prospects in your market. You're creating a data asset that compounds for the next 12 months.
Meanwhile, your competitors are on the sidelines making excuses.
They're missing the people who matter most.
By February, your competitors are behind on market share, algorithm efficiency, and customer lifetime value. They can't afford to compete with you in the auction.
The Paradox That Changes Everything
Here's what most people don't understand about December, or any market disruption.
The market doesn't pause. It shifts.
When everyone else is pulling back, the playing field doesn't get smaller. It gets clearer.
There's less noise. Less competition for attention. Less bidding pressure in the auction.
The opportunity to capture market share, to train the algorithm on your ideal customers, to become the default choice in your market. It's right there.
But only if you see it.
And you can only see it if you believe it's possible.
Someone who is resisting the identity change that comes with the next level will use the holidays as a reason if they have to.
But someone who has already made that identity shift sees December as a land grab.
They see the opportunity where others see an excuse.
They're still profitable. Still making money. Still hitting their numbers. But they're thinking two moves ahead.
They understand that the decision they make in December compounds for the next 12 months.
They understand that building a business with a high LTV is not about being aggressive or reckless.
It's about being strategic.
It's about understanding that a customer worth $30,000, $100,000, or millions is worth paying $5,000 to $15,000 to acquire.
That customer is worth keeping happy. Better service. Better product. They refer more people. Your LTV goes up. You can spend more on acquisition. You grow faster. You win.
Meanwhile, you're still thinking about whether you can afford a $40 lead when they're acquiring $100,000 customers.
One is thinking about cost per lead today. The other is thinking about customer value over a lifetime. When that gap is $30,000 to $100,000 per customer, or millions, one business owns the market. The other can't compete.
The Choice
We all have a choice about which identity we want to adopt.
The identity of someone who pulls back when things get uncertain. Who uses external events as reasons to slow down. Who thinks in terms of survival and scarcity.
Or the identity of someone who sees the shift and presses forward. Who understands that the decision made in December compounds for the next 12 months. Who thinks in terms of building a business that can outbid anyone in the market.
That choice determines everything.
And here's what I've learned from peering behind the curtains of hundreds of businesses....
Once you start moving in that direction, opportunities that were there all along start to become visible.
The market doesn't change. Your competitors' behavior doesn't change. The auction dynamics don't change.
What changes is you.
And when you change, you see what was always possible.
āLance C. Greenberg
PS: If you're not sure what your real constraint is, or if you're solving the wrong problems while your competitors quietly take your market share, go to LanceCGreenberg.com and see how I help business owners cut through the noise and identify the 2-4 moves that actually matter.